>>9905If you are serious about analyzing the American psyche and its response to events, I would first dispense with the rhetoric of "rich people". Let us not descend into the extremely tired topic of GDP, PPP, currency exchange rates, average income, household expenditure, and so on. Americans may be, on a global scale, rich, yes; they do live in the center and not the periphery, they have a comparatively large consumer wallet, and money flows its fastest and deepest rivers there.
The whole "rich people" thing is itself a tired lens in which to view the world, a misleading, reddit-tier cliche. You aren't wrong by bringing it up, but let me guide your intuition in a different direction, and replace your "rich people response" with "globally politically privileged response". It's a mouthful, and I'm still workshopping it, sorry. But the idea is the same, and what you yourself described - the position of being unaffected by global events, and especially those that are directly or indirectly caused by their nation's actions (so, most of it). By reframing richness into political privilege, we can circumvent the standard American counter you hear from them about how the poor and disadvantaged in the US suffer. And I will be happy to repeat that claim, too: yes, there is a shit load of poverty in the US, both material and im-, and much of it is not exactly obvious when looking at numbers and statistics such as income. But this deflects from global privilege. That is, even the poorest and most pitiable American is still in a position of privilege by the sheer fact of being American and living in the US. As you said, they will not be affected by tangible blows to society, outside of 9/11.
This is an extremely unpopular, and extremely unapproached, point of view in political discourse, especially within the past few decades. Americans will not acknowledge this at all, if they can even grasp it, and if confronted with it, will continue to harp on about poverty or discrimination or this and that.
However, I would also counter the general tone of your comment about Americans being unaffected by much outside of rare events such as 9/11 or the 2008 financial crisis (which was a global event anyway). The third world and periphery has its terrible, hellish strife, yes. But life in America is one of constant, low-level physical, mental, psychological, and psychic attrition. The whining that they do online DOES have basis in reality, albeit one irritatingly detached from international cause-and-effect. Life there is not fun. I would argue that it's not exactly even for the ultra-rich, which is why so many of them have one foot outside of the US at all times, if not having fled entirely, using the US as a financial headquarters and physically residing in Geneva or Monaco or Wellington or some shit (Dubai was recently on this list too). This is not because the ultra-rich have to strive for material comforts, but again, because of that constant low-level attrition that is environmental, ambient, and all-encompassing, when you are inside the borders of the US. It's a spiritual malaise, certainly, although we're supposed to discuss politics in material terms only - not the useful Marxist kind, but the base secular kind. And that spiritual malaise affects you, and is impossible to escape from, unless you leave altogether.