It seems that conspiracy theories are no longer a fringe phenomenon confined to tinfoil hat-wearing preppers and everyone is a conspiracy theorist now. Why do you think conspiratorial explanations of world events have exploded in popularity? Which conspiracy theories do YOU believe in, or wish others believed in?
Conspiracy theories are themselves a conspiracy theory to distract the masses from collective action.
I believe that blue light has a negative and dulling effect on the brain, and addictive social media, in addition to its own retardifying effects, is designed to maximise exposure to the harmful effect of blue light
1.
My favorite conspiracy theory is the very narrow inference that the Newport Tower was built by a covert pre-Jamestown mission sent by the English to colonize North America. Such a colonization attempt was attempted covertly in order to circumvent Catholic domination in the New World.
The facts: Spanish interdiction of English expeditions into the Atlantic was frequent and greatly feared by the English in the 1570s, such as in the 1579 event when Humphrey Gilbert's expeditionary fleet had to dodge the Spanish at Land's End in Cornwall. One of the ships in that event was the English ship "Squirrel." Earlier in the 1570s the "Squirrel" visited Narragansett Bay, where Newport is. John Dee identifies the location of the Newport Tower on his own maps and the site in Narragansett Bay was known as "Dee's Island." The pilot of the "Squirrel's" trip to Narragansett was Simon Fernandes, an experienced transatlantic pilot working for England who would later go on to pilot the ships to England's "Lost Colony". The Newport Tower matches the architecture of stone mills that were built at the time in 16th century England, and such mills have been documented in Cambridgeshire. (John Dee had attended Cambridge University.) The construction of a mill indicates that the mill-builders (the English, in this inference) had vastly overconfident expectations about their own abilities to farm the area. If such a colony existed, it failed for any number of possible reasons.
2.
This one is more general and extravagant.
Elements of the US security state achieved an independent political consciousness in the early Cold War. Call it the "nuclear deep state." They charged themselves with the responsibility of guaranteeing humanity's future existence. Most of their day-to-day work is in facilitating various technical aspects of nuclear deterrence. They develop design parameters for new kinds of missiles and aircraft for various kinds of conflict: AH-64s, A-10s, tank-busters and tactical nukes for Soviet armored divisions in the Fulda Gap; variable yield or strategic nukes for popping Pyonyang, etc. They develop strategy papers on various forms of nuclear conflict theory: limited nuclear options, strike-on-warning, counterforce vs countervalue, etc. They adopted game theory as their overarching ideology. They tend to focus on the presidency because the US security structure puts the decision to use nuclear weapons solely in the hands of the President, without any checks or balances. This has been called a "thermonuclear monarchy."
The nuclear deep state has overlapped substantially with small cliques who have directly replaced US presidents. The nuclear deep state seems to have responded to the Cuban Missile Crisis as an existential threat that justified regime change against JFK. Allen Dulles, due to his personal adversity with JFK, became the focal point for a broad-based effort to replace JFK. The specific alignment of shooters and getaway locations is incidental. The second shooter was probably an OAS gun-for-hire recruited through the "French Connection". Lee Harvey Oswald was a used-up counterintelligence asset designated as disposable by James Jesus Angleton.
This breakaway polity also used Alexander Haig as a pass-through to weaken Richard Nixon. Nixow was probably mis-understood by the nuclear deep state as a genuine China hawk. Nixon took a characterisically two-faced stance towards the China Lobby. Nixon relied on Anna Chenault and Henry Kissinger to help undermine LBJ's chances at success in negotiations. The nuclear deep state probably misunderstood Nixon's alignment as trending towards intervention in favor of the Republic of China that would spiral toward a full nuclear war between East and West. As we now know, Nixon's actual alignment was towards detente and his visit to China has turned out to be one of the most consequential events of the 20th century. But the development of the game-theoretical strategy known as "madman theory" caused an accidental affinity between the nuclear deep state and Nixon. The nuclear deep state offered up this bit of game theory based on its estimation of Nixon as an unscrupulous and opportunistic leader who could cause a nuclear war out of sheer chaos, and Nixon selected this strategy out of an appreciation for how the cover of chaos allowed him to secretly retain the initiative. The nuclear deep state's first attempt to weaken Nixon is now known as the "Radford-Moorer affair" and probably involved Alexander Haig intercepting secure packets moving between the Pentagon and National Security Advisor Kissinger. After Nixon successfully suppressed the political consequences of that, the nuclear deep state probably decided to use Nixon's inclinations against him and to discredit him via the Watergate break-ins. The break-ins themselves were astonishingly foolish and conducted by Bay-of-Pigs hangers-on. The break-ins were directed by John Dean and the information was leaked by Deep Throat, who was in fact Alexander Haig. As expected, Nixon bungled an attempt to suppress investigation, and was caught up by his own suspicious and secretive habits. But with his survivor's instincts sensing the autocoup's nature almost exactly, Nixon responded to the Watergate by quipping “I can go in my office and pick up the telephone, and in 25 minutes, millions of people will be dead."
Since Watergate, the nuclear deep state lost its verve for eliminating presidents. The Iran Contra affair was a tossed-off bit of blowback stemming from the parapolitical currents of guns, oil, and drugs that were maintained as a standing surplus for use by the nuclear deep state. Osama Bin Laden and the Taliban tapped into some of those currents. Saddam Hussein and Muammar Ghaddafi were other used-up assets to be culled, like Lee Harvey Oswald. But the nuclear deep state was also conflicted about the Bush White House. The neocons in the Bush White House knew the play that they wanted to run in the Middle East and were willing to distort and frustrate business-as-usual for the nuclear deep state in order to achieve these ends. But there was wildcat resistance by career bureaucrats inside the nuclear deep state who resented the interference in their day-to-day work, which they consider to be of existential importance to humanity. So there were occasional leaks from inside the nuclear deep state and attempts to counter-program the consent that had been manufactured against Saddam.
The nuclear deep state still exists, however. It is still manufacturing consent. Look at this week's Atlantic and think about it as laying the groundwork for Katherine Bigelow's forthcoming thriller -- House of Dynamite.
3.
The most abstract and wide-reaching.
"Hyperstition" is abundant. I will modestly define "hyperstition" as the capacity for descriptive conjectures to be re-appropriated as normative ideals that can coordinate the efforts of people distributed across space and time.
When the neo-Ciceronian humanist rhetors joined forces with the Okhamite nominalists to overthrow the dominant Scotists who controlled the universities, they had no clue what they were unleashing. The subsequent generations of nominalist philosophy (which CS Peirce called a "demonic doctrine") provided the epistemic basis for dehumanizing epistemologies. The breakthrough success for the Ockhamites occurred in England following Francis Bacon and the anglo tradition of reductivism led to Hobbes, Locke, and all the great intellectuals of the East India Company. Hobbes, of course, was Bacon's amanuensis, and he internalized a deep suspicion of all of Bacon's idols. But what Hobbes could not foresee was that his description of a successful Stuart monarchy (in *Leviathan*) would itself become an idol to succeeding generations.
There is a parallel to Descartes vivisecting dogs just to show his students that the soul was not an organ: the great British Empiricists first described the world as nothing more than a balance of effective causalities, and as if to prove that to be the British Empire effected a total planetary dehumanization. British utilitarianism articulated a binary vocabulary for the whole planet comprised exclusively of pulses of pain and gratification. People became slaves, or vetti-chakiri, or bondsmen, or indentured servants -- and once they were not people any more, they became horseflesh to be whipped and then relieved. The human becomes a pile of corpuscles that release energy in one direction or another, and that release can be controlled through the intelligent application of terror.
The same happens with other descriptive frames in modernity. Fichte's consolations to a defeated and stateless German nation provide the script for German nationalists to launch apocalypse wars against Europe. Cyberneticism starts off as a description of organic learning, and then becomes a norm that legitimates dehumanization. We grasp at AI not because it is truly intelligent, but because our thinkers offer us such an impoverished idea of intelligence that we are forced to accept autocomplete as meeting their humiliating expectations.
>It seems that conspiracy theories are no longer a fringe phenomenon confined to tinfoil hat-wearing preppers and everyone is a conspiracy theorist now. Why do you think conspiratorial explanations of world events have exploded in popularity?
This is the western midwit's favorite take. Always falls flat on my ears as I try to contemplate how all of the history of human thought can be reduced to one trend in one direction. I challenge OP to actually substantiate this claim instead of just throwing it out there for the losers on this board to write his college homework for him.
Online convert Catholicism, whether it’s the ‘based epic tradcath’ variety or the ‘mommy Mary loves me’ variety, is a trend astroturfed by the Vatican in an attempt to repair their reputation after Catholicism became virtually synonymous with mass abuse of children and adults.
The smaller ‘Orthobro’ phenomenon is a KGB operation to get maladjusted young men to side with Russia.
I called you a retardfaggot but my cat stepped on my keyboard sorry
https://tannerfboyle.substack.com/p/remote-viewing-as-intelligence-laundering
This one is good. Remote viewing -- CIA Gateway Tapes, "Men who Stare at Goats" stuff -- was counter-intelligence kayfabe meant to launder intel derived from vulnerable intelligence assets and cloud Ivan's abilities to track our "sources and methods" (IE the stuff that the intel community protects most dearly).
I am of the opinion we need to reject conspiracy thinking, because the erosion of trust that has resulted from the masses embracing conspiracy theories is a danger to America. The anti vax thing is the perfect example.
Why is everyone on Substack now?