Petrarchive – Al-Ma'arri, Medieval vegan

back
No.12710 Anonymous
Al-Ma'arri, Medieval vegan
Post image
Born 974AD. Blind academic, poet. Vegan and Skeptic.

"You are diseased in understanding and religion. Come to me, that you may hear something of sound truth.

Do not unjustly eat fish the water has given up, and do not
desire as food the flesh of slaughtered animals,
Or the white milk of mothers who intended its pure draught for their young, not for noble ladies.

And do not grieve the unsuspecting birds by taking their eggs; for injustice is the worst of crimes.

And spare the honey which the bees get industriously from the flowers of fragrant plants;
For they did not store it that it might belong to others, nor did
they gather it for bounty and gifts.

I washed my hands of all this; and wish that I had perceived
my way before my hair went gray!"
No.12711 Anonymous>>12712
Unbelievably based, thanks for sharing. I love the sublime feeling one gets when they read something from the past that not only resonates today but seems to echo 1:1 issues and assumptions we think are "modern".

>For they did not store it that it might belong to others, nor did they gather it for bounty and gifts.

When I was a tween and started to object to eating meat I heard from relatives and others the following explanation: "God put animals on the Earth for humans to consume". Even at the time it struck me as a bone-headed "just-so" justification for something that everyone knew was kind of wrong but continued anyway. Now of course I have the rhetoric and vocabulary to describe that layman understanding and usage of religion to explain "how things are". Anyway, sorry for the tangent.
No.12712 Anonymous
>>12711
no problem and don't apologise for tangents. My parents didn't justify consumption of animal products by citing religion but rather inconvenience, which might be more fucked up lol. I seriously believe that most people don't go vegan for this very reason whatever else they might assert. dairy especially is in everything
No.12716 Anonymous
Very interesting post. I always considered the refusal to even eat honey to be a ridiculous purity signal by contemporary vegans but it's interesting to see that someone else derived the same proscription in an entirely different context.
No.12725 Anonymous
Another fire post, we've been blessed recently. Gotta get back to cutting down on meat consumption.
No.12731 Anonymous
Fascinating quote.

I myself am a meat eater,but I do respect the commitments that he made towards his own beliefs.
No.12734 Anonymous>>12736 >>12740
> Born in the city of al-Ma'arra (present-day Ma'arrat al-Nu'man, Syria) during the later Abbasid era, he became blind at a young age from smallpox but nonetheless studied in nearby Aleppo, then in Tripoli and Antioch. Producing popular poems in Baghdad, he refused to sell his texts. In 1010, he returned to Syria after his mother began declining in health, and continued writing, which gained him local respect.

> Described by various scholars as a "pessimistic freethinker", al-Ma'arri was a controversial rationalist of his time, known for challenging superstition and dogmatism. His written works exhibit a fixation on the study of language and its historical development, known as philology. He was pessimistic about life, describing himself as "a double prisoner" of blindness and isolation. Because his poetry fiercely critiqued the religious practices of his era, several critics interpreted his work as an attack on Judaism, Christianity, Islam, and Zoroastrianism, with some historians asserting he became a deist. However, in response to contemporary accusations of heresy stemming from these poetic critiques, al-Ma'arri authored Zajr al-Nabeh. In this text, he explicitly denied holding atheistic or anti-Islamic beliefs, clarifying that his verses targeted the corruption, hypocrisy, and ignorance of religious figures rather than the core tenets of the faith itself.

> He advocated social justice and lived a secluded, ascetic lifestyle. He was a vegan, known in his time as a moral vegetarian, entreating: "Do not desire as food the flesh of slaughtered animals / Or the white milk of mothers who intended its pure draught for their young."[11] Al-Ma'arri held an antinatalist outlook, in line with his general pessimism, suggesting that children should not be born to spare them of the pains and suffering of life. Saqt az-Zand, Luzumiyat, and Risalat al-Ghufran are among his main works.

> Consistent with his pervasive pessimism, al-Ma'arri harbored a deep skepticism regarding gender relations and advocated for the strict seclusion of women. As analyzed by the Egyptian scholar Taha Hussein, al-Ma'arri advised against teaching women to read or write to shelter them from societal corruption, and controversially argued that the Hajj pilgrimage should not be obligatory for them.

Oh man… he’s just like me except blind and Muslim.
No.12735 Anonymous
reddit philosopher sorry bruh
No.12736 Anonymous>>12737
>>12734
>Advocated for the strict seclusion of women, against teaching women to read and write.
>he's just like me
Anon, what?
No.12737 Anonymous
>>12736
Yeah that was the part I meant that was just like me.
No.12739 Anonymous>>12746
I know for a fact that eating factory farm meat is evil but I keep eating it, why is this?
No.12740 Anonymous
>>12734
>an otherwise highly progressive figure from the past is very misogynistic

more at 11
No.12741 Anonymous
he was incredibly based, love this quote/poem(?) "O'er many a race the sun's bright net was spread

And loosed their pearls nor left them even a thread.

This dire World delights us, though all sup,

All whom she mothers, from one mortal cup.

A choice of ills: which rather of the twain

Wilt thou?—to perish or to live in pain?"
No.12746 Anonymous
>>12739
I still do it because I could frankly care less about the animals, I care only about the taste.
No.12751 Anonymous>>12752 >>12753
>he explicitly denied holding atheistic or anti-Islamic beliefs, clarifying that his verses targeted the corruption, hypocrisy, and ignorance of religious figures rather than the core tenets of the faith itself.
Islam explicitly allows meat consumption and encourages animal sacrifice on Eid. Bro was coping
No.12752 Anonymous>>12753
>>12751
nah he was pretending, imagine openly opposing islam in an islamic country. dude was fending blasphemy accusations
No.12753 Anonymous>>12756
>>12751
>>12752
His views are obviously not in line with mainstream Islamic thought but not every Muslim scholar who isn't 100% in line with Ibn Taymiyya is a secret non-Muslim.
No.12756 Anonymous>>12760
>>12753
>You are diseased in understanding and religion.
Idk man seems pretty non-islamic to me to be saying something like that. While I do agree that not every scholar who is muslim has to be an exact certain way, there definitely were scholars who were straight up non-religious who had to LARP as religious in order to not get executed, both in the past and in the modern day.
No.12760 Anonymous>>12792
>>12756
The quote in the OP does not necessarily say what follows are tenets or requirements of Islam, for all we know he could've meant the following "sound truths" to be things that are self-evident to people with proper understanding of religion and piety. Since it's a translation it's hard to make any such judgements, but it's not impossible to interpret it in a way that would be in line with even the most Takfiri-Salafi thought, e.g. stating that it's something that's not required of all Muslims, and considering it an innovation but a meritorious one, and considering any religious practices like the Eid sacrifice the exception to the rule. It's not possible to extrapolate his entire religious beliefs from this alone.

Not that I'd be surprised if he had some seriously unorthodox views on other matters, but even then from what I've been able to gather he has high standing among modern Sufis and was a prolific writer/teacher, and I doubt he'd have achieved that if he was just LARPing. Also there are many Muslim sects that consider each other non-believers yet consider themselves Muslims, so even the question of whether his views are in line with mainstream thought or not is ultimately irrelevant to what he identified as.

His English Wikipedia article seems to have a long discussion on this too detailing how early Western scholarship rushed to brand him as non-religious while later study ended up being against that idea.
No.12792 Anonymous>>12796
>>12760
I retract my previous point then anon about him LARPing then, interesting post anon. I myself am not that well versed within the differences between the sunni islamic branches, though i've got some general knowledge of the differences between them.

If I'm not wrong,Sufism is more of a mystic form of islam, correct? Kind of a direct parallel to salafism which is much more conservative and wanting to go back to muhammad's time. I do know some scant details about wahhabism which was a more revisionary form of islam created far later.
No.12796 Anonymous>>12799
>>12792
Generally Salafi and Wahhabi are used interchangeably, referring to Sunni Muslims who stick strictly to the Quran and the Sunnah and follow literalist interpretations, but Wahhabi is seen more as a derogatory label and is used by people who are against Salafism. Probably because it anchors the beginning of the movement to the 18th century.

>Sufism is more of a mystic form of islam, correct?
Yes, Sufism focuses a lot more on the spiritual aspects of religion, and has practices like group Dhikr, meditation, seclusion etc. that are not found in mainstream Islam. It also emphasizes Sheikh/Murid relations, and the Sheikhs have chains of transmissions called Silsila that trace back to the Prophet. If you search "Sufi Silsilas" on Google Images you'll find some nice tree graphs outlining the major Sufi orders. So even though they can engage in practices that don't exist or even seemingly go against the practices detailed in the Sunni hadith books the Silsilas give them legitimacy, at least within their own orders.
No.12799 Anonymous>>12802
>>12796
Damn,had no idea that wahabbi and salafi were the same thing. I thought that wahabbi islam was more of an arab supremacy form of islam if I'm being honest,given that it's pushed heavily by the saudis in africa.

I do know that there's another branch of islam aside from the sunni and shia in the form of ibadi islam, and I do know that they originated in Oman, and that they were part of the succession crisis that happened after muhammad's death,but I don't exactly know much about the specific details. If im not wrong, while the Shia had Ali as the next ruler, the sunni had the "rightly guided caliphs", while Ibadi islam evolved to be something a bit more democratic?
No.12802 Anonymous
>>12799
I don't know too much about the first/second fitnah to talk about them, but the Sunni do recognize Ali as one of the rightly guided caliphs, while Shia reject the other three that came before him. I think Ibadis only recognize the first two.
No.13205 Anonymous>>13209
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Case_of_the_Animals_versus_Man

>Fī aṣnāf al-ḥayawānāt wa-ʿajāʾib hayākilihā wa-gharāʾib aḥwālihā (Arabic: في أصناف الحيوانات وعجائب هياكلها وغرائب أحوالها),[1] known in English as The Case of the Animals versus Man Before the King of the Jinn,[a] is an epistle written by the Brethren of Purity (Ikhwān al-Ṣafā) in the 960s and first published as Epistle 22 in the Encyclopedia of the Brethren of Purity. The longest Encyclopedia entry, The Case of the Animals versus Man revolves around a group of talking animals who testify against humans in a session chaired by the ruler of the jinn. It has been favourably received by literary critics and translated into several languages.
No.13209 Anonymous
>>13205
thanks for sharing.

>The closing remarks are made by an enigmatic figure described as "Persian by breeding, Arabian by faith, a ḥanīf by confession, Iraqi in culture, Hebrew in lore, Christian in manner, Damascene in devotion, Greek in science, Indian in discernment, Sufi in intimations."[b][21] The man suggests that humans have yet to fully realise their potential.[c] The trial abruptly concludes with the verdict being in mankind's favour

:(
No.13211 Anonymous
That's a banger line. I like that for some people there's always been a tendency to make oneself a sort of cultural collage, something I relate to as well